Very proud of the decision by @Tutanota to be no longer listed on the copperhead OS webpage once they heard about the history of the company. I wish more companies were vigilant like this. Way to go guys!
@blacklight447 @Tutanota @freddyym For the sake of transparency, are you part of Graphene? I know Daniel and James have issues, but it seems the hatred is always going from Daniel toward Copperhead, and I don’t see much from Copperhead attacking Daniel. How do we know he isn’t just a bitter ex-employee? How can we trust what Daniel says is true?
@techygrue @Tutanota @freddyym here, james is also actively going after foss contributers under the notion of copyright:https://renlord.com/posts/2020-03-25-copperheados-legal-threat/
@blacklight447 @Tutanota @freddyym This seems a little strange. Why would they be taking code from Copperhead to paste into Graphene codebase if it originated with Graphene? Wouldn’t Daniel already have that code if it was his? I would expect more code going from Graphene into Copperhead if they were just using Daniel’s code. I’m not a lawyer, maybe I misunderstood the letters.
@techygrue @Tutanota @freddyym the code is daniels, from the android hardening project, which got renamed into graphene os, now james is trying to claim it is his, and is attacking people who contribute to graphene os.
@blacklight447 @Tutanota @freddyym hmm, interesting. Thanks for sharing!
@techygrue @Tutanota @freddyym I am not part of graphene OS, i am part of the team behind privacytools.io, which is a nonprofit organization trying to educate the masses about privacy. One piece of evidence is by looking at the copperhead source code, their latest published version is from 2019. Right now all they do is litterly copy paste daniel code and put the copperhead branding on it. You can even see parts of the Graphene OS documentation on the copperhead website.