Show more
resist1984 boosted

#GMail is harmful to e-mail ecosystem; its antispam blocking policy matches too many valid messages as spam.

It blocked LastPass email leak warning email, because it contained "a link" to a leaked site.

It blocked an e-mail from goverment agency addressed directly to me.

It discriminates all non-gmail servers, and it's pretty much impossible to own a private SMTP server these days, because GMail will classify everything as spam.

It's not how e-mail should work.

Consider dropping GMail.

resist1984 boosted

#Codeberg.org & #gitea made the increadibly stupid decision to break on some browsers because doing so improves server performance in those cases where they've broken shit. Of course if you break a web browser you're going to have a lighter load. You can also lighten the load by taking the server offline. codeberg.org/Codeberg/Communit

@protonmail isn't good either because it discriminates against people with disabilities & impairments. hCAPTCHA is also partnered with , the web's biggest privacy abuser. users don't want to support privacy abusers. hCAPTCHA also needlessly imposes a GUI & non-free on users. Plz find a different option than hCAPTCHA.

@nergal That robot found 24 US banks that were illegally sharing consumer data.

resist1984 boosted

@nergal People need to stop the bot hate. Comp Sci people at created a robot that harvests websites for policies, and do an automated comparison to find banks that are relatively more privacy respecting: vice.com/en/article/9a3nbp/car

@nergal People need to stop the bot hate. Comp Sci people at created a robot that harvests websites for policies, and do an automated comparison to find banks that are relatively more privacy respecting: vice.com/en/article/9a3nbp/car

@nergal surprises are a bad thing, but what's going on here is much worse than surprises. It's also wrong to say that bots are a "problem". Just like humans, bots can be either harmful or beneficial.

@Salastil For threat models that include targeted surveillance, Protonmail is generally a bad choice because they can selectively push malicious javascript. But there is a control for that: anonymously download . That ensures that you're running the same static js that everyone else is.

@Salastil As for storing email at , that's a non-issue because it's encrypted (e2ee & at rest). If it's unencrypted mail that triggers your comment, that's a valid concern. I have no idea to what extent people use Protonmail for plaintext email. PM-to-PM & PM-to-external-PGP only exposes metadata to mass surveillance programs to the extent that the Swiss jurisdiction has them.

@Salastil The problems w/MS are direct privacy offenses to a small extent (Tor users get bad treatment) & indirect privacy offenses to a large extent (MS profits from privacy abuse so any time you use any of their services you help a privacy abuser's bottom line). Github is also detrimental to quality of by discouraging bug reports:

@jpaul Losing is a big loss for expert-to-novice comms b/c an expert can get a novice's PM pubkey & reach them securely w/out having a PM acct themselves. Apart from PM only Hushmail can do that AFAIK & HM is no longer gratis.

@jpaul it depends on the scenario. The best move for expert users doesn't change, which is to use an ESP like danwin or onionmail w/a PGP-capable MUA like mutt or Thunderbird. For novice users it's non-trivial, but generally , , or .

@altlink @vesperto links are socially irresponsible & detrimental, so a good admins seek to control them. The altlink bot is overly non-intrusive IMO. If I were an admin, I would do more to get CF links out of public view.

Show more
Mastodon πŸ” privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!