Show more

@PaulaToThePeople @dsfgs I believe "Cloudglare" is dsfgs's deliberate misspelling of , which is the elephant in the room that your otherwise comprehensive article neglects while actually referring users to , a CF site that should be avoided.

@Gargron @janssens_bart the ethical thing for to do is to acknowledge that it's not their place to control who gets to interact with politicians and refuse to serve all politicians who (mis)use Twitter as a public service. It's not the profitable move but it's the ethical one.

@janssens_bart @Gargron As a state actor, has no place on in the 1st place. Nor does or any other politician. We expect politicians to serve *the public*, not members of an exclusive walled garden that's centrally controlled by a private corporation who controls who among the /public/ may communicate to their representatives in /public/ office.

@Gargron @janssens_bart It's precisely the banning of low-profile activists that serve as strong rationale to leave twtr, as well as the substantial number of Indians that marginalized not too long ago.

@janssens_bart @Gargron banned me (a small-time activist who exposes the harms of ). My posts were civil but CF is a powerful adversary. Banning someone who incites violence & pushes misinfo from a trusted posture (e.g. ) is not a strong case against Twitter. And sadly, only relatively non-controversial bans get headlines b/c civil activists like myself aren't notworthy.

resist1984 boosted

@deejoe @andre @resist1984

One thing on my project list: a Universal Product Catalog. Find a product on the site, and the site will link you directly to all the places you can get it (online and/or local to you) -- the actual product pages, where possible -- eventually with crowdsourced ratings of each source, along various metrics including ethicality.

@andre @deejoe @woozle The detailed list of wrongdoing can be huge. For example, see some of the pull-down arrows in the 1st post of this thread: codeberg.org/swiso/website/iss

@woozle @deejoe @andre one way to accommodate everyone is to be very lax in what issues get exposure, but give every user a filter to hide issues that don't concern them. Perhaps hide by default rules that a majority of users are proactively hiding.

@woozle @andre @deejoe when you say the /collective/, do you mean all consumers or a select group of mods? That's the tricky part b/c while I think (for eg.) is a show-stopping evil that needs a big spotlight most normies are ok w/it. I would put up a fight to get CloudFlare flags while the majority wouldn't care & there would even be some who fully oppose disclosure of CF. What then?

@andre @deejoe @woozle If I were doing this, I'd probably conclude that most merchants are doing something unethical to varying degrees (the idea is to compare them), but Amazon crosses a line where they aren't even worthy of the comparison. Of course, excluding Amazon pricing would turn some ppl off, but they can be written off b/c they're not aligned with the mission anyway.

@woozle @andre @deejoe Those types of services come and go over the years, but they're always useful and needed most now with 's stranglehold. The crowdsourced ratings will consume a large share of your energy I suspect. The ethics feature is the very needed thing that could make it a killer service distinguished from the rest. So I suggest deferring the ratings for far in the future.

@neil @techware Jami is hands-down superior to Wire from an ethics PoV, but has usability/UX issues that narrows the userbase. Briar is also superior to Wire ethically, but being Android-only narrows applicability. In any case, if Signal is on top popularity-wise w/your correspondants something is very wrong. There's no good reason for that.

@techware @neil You forgot to mention , , , & . shares many of 's problems & it's equally reprehensible. is superior to Signal, sharing just a couple of Signal's problems but avoids the most serious issues that Signal has. It's almost a drop-in replacement, notwithstanding case where metadata exposure is incompatible with threat models.

@rysiek @twsh Looks interesting. I predict they will overlook a big obsticle to open access: universities often subscribe to electronic books & journals that are jailed in the walled garden of . Even "open access" publications are encumbered by this affliction, & schools turn a blind eye to it. It needs exposure. Consider raising the issue if you see the opportunity.

@lps @privacyint i would have liked to see a link, b/c it's a bit out of charactor for Brits to care about privacy.

@tobi Broken website. Trying to reach the context via doesn't work either- it's firing blanks. When a *.gov site is CFd there's a bit of extra embarrassment that the gov can't work out how to secure their own resources so they outsource, and then lack the competence of selecting an unoppressive supplier.

To those disturbed by the attack on the US capitol: this is a good time to recall that & are both members, which means they financially support . them both. Use instead.

resist1984 boosted

The Internet was built as a kind of decentralized democracy. Change is slow and messy but it protects us from a single entity forcing their will on us.

When you move your data and social graph to a closed platform you vote for authoritarian rule.

Such choices never end well.

@jubes I think clever web design can mitigate the perceived need for . E.g. code image dimensions into the html so the important content can quickly render before the images. Use ( alternative) on pages with form input. Failing that, CF has competitors that are more worthy, who don't attack your own users as a consequence of their sloppy technique.

Show more
Mastodon 🔐 privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!