Show more

@dl @dredmorbius Good points. is the "no politics diner" in my experience. You get a dozen moderators and it becomes a race to the bottom with coupled with to hide the censorship.

@randynose @oilyfish I also recall Uber doing some sneaky shit like poaching staff from competitors to steal trade secrets.

@oilyfish @randynose I've not, but Uber is a shit company bent on right-wing politics. Drivers often drive for both, and if you ask them they tend to be less happy with Uber -- which isn't too surprising considering right-wing principles have little regard for work conditions.

@Mojeek one search engine that cators for this need is searxes.eu.org.

@Mojeek actually I prefer biased results. I want search results that respect privacy. That means I need a search engine that does not lead to sites. I am biased against sites that disregard & privacy, and I want my search results to cater for my bias.

@dl
That's a good example of "tragedy of the commons". But I think the tragedy can be limited by consumers who realize they have a duty to bad players.

@dredmorbius @temporal

resist1984 boosted

Advertising Is a Cancer on Society

...Real world advertising is not about informing, it's about convincing. Over time, it became increasingly manipulative and dishonest. It also became more effective. In the process, it grew to consume a significant amount of resources of every company on the planet. It infected every communication medium in existence, both digital and analog. ...

-- @temporal

jacek.zlydach.pl/blog/2019-07-

#advertising #AdvertisingIsCancer

@dredmorbius @temporal
Great article.. very comprehensive. But he did miss one point:

* is an arms race. A supplier may not want to spend money on ads, but is forced when a competitor does so.

@thegibson
Some people refuse to vote over this. Many states *publish* the physical address & party affiliation of all registered voters. likely has the IP - physical address pairings.. lots of possibilities here, none of which are good for .

@leip4Ier@infosec.exchange
It's very disturbing that this code exists. First, it helps victims of 's help Google. We should CAPTCHA not solve more of them. This s/w undermines the boycott.

It's also disturbing that it's , b/c we can no longer criticise CAPTCHA pushers for imposing . It defeats a strong argument that CAPTCHA fighters had. Or does it still run Google's proprietary j/s?

@oilyfish
one case I can see for an URL shortener is when using the client. It can't see your msg as you type it, so it has no way of predicting what the server will do in order to adjust the character count.

@oilyfish
I thought URL shortening was built into the server. If you enter an URL, you should see that the number of characters deducted from your allowance is less than the number of characters in the URL.

I can't suggest an URL shortener but I will say that is the worst of them b/c of the abuse of . All 3rd party URL shorteners (e.g. bit.ly) abuse to some extent (it's how they make money).

@oilyfish
I can't follow your links because it imposes the great wall of , which blocks users.

@Br0m3x @Tusky yikes. Why would it? We know creators of the network disregard the & abuses of (after all, they're behind mastodon.social), but is made by the same people? I just don't see why the app would use CF. Is it perhaps executing CF javascript?

@mplammers @JamieLBarnett BTW, has lots of privacy issues (see this famous thread: github.com/privacytoolsIO/priv). And DDG only pretends to be good for privacy; searxes.eu.org is better for privacy.

Show more
Mastodon 🔐 privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!