Show more

@croqaz @nikolal great find! Although I wish it could accept @*.onion email recipients. And it's not good that the project uses . But the from svr to recipient shows they're on the ball for sure - no one else is doing that. needs to take some notes there.

@jonas @wuwei @sudo IOW, you can get more with the same amount of skill from Searxes than DDG.

@sudo @wuwei @jonas you don't understand. It takes no more talent to use a Searxes search field than it does to use a DDG search field. If someone is too mentally challenged to use , then they are also incapable of using .

@gerowen @wuwei @jonas @sudo you are *trusting* to do what they say they do, & they've already been caught violating their privacy policy by issueing tracker cookies. The CEO also has a history of abuse. DDG is obviously untrustworthy. DDG also finances privacy abusers (, , & ), & supports .

@sudo @jonas @wuwei That's grasping for straws. I struggle to see how someone can be so mentally challenged as to be unable do a query, even if the field has an Esperanto background. Results are in English. There are also other options that don't simultaneously feed Amazon, Verizon-Yahoo, and MS. DDG is a poor recommendation from a PoV.

@jonas @wuwei and to say any searx instance "don't return anything due to bad configuration", it's wrong to say the config is bad. It's a consequence of /scraping/ instead of /buying API access/, & this is good for . buys API access, which entails helping (a privacy abuser) profit.

@wuwei @jonas I think you're confusing the Searxes instance (searxes.eu.org) w/the the decentralized network. If you use a searx instance arbitrarily it often gets zero results; but Searxes avoids that problem & gives good results

@Mr_Teatime @nipos the Firefox plugin that redirects CF sites is called "Block Cloudflare MITM Attack" and is posted here: addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firef. Description is in cyrillic but don't let that scare you off. This plugin will outright block CF sites: gitlab.com/gkrishnaks/cloud-fi

@nipos @Mr_Teatime there is a very useful browser plugin that detects & automatically redirects to the archive of the page.

@Mr_Teatime @nipos archive.org does users a service b/c it helps bypass the (if needed) & ensures the target site is not rewarded w/traffic or interaction.

@nipos @Mr_Teatime w/ whitelisted is even worse, b/c then Tor users don't know they are interacting w/a CF MitM. Tor users then unwittingly support a Tor adversary.

is now hitting the archive.org wayback machine with the same as users, thus censoring history too.

@Yes2020 @theprivacyfoundation actually there are no obvious problems with mastodon.scot (it's not a site & not hosted by a tech giant). The issues discussed in the thread are specifically with mastodon.social.

@theprivacyfoundation
VPN is still lousy advice b/c there is no anonymity. The entry node knows the origin and the network thereafter sees the whole path. Even when combined with or , both of which anonymize independently, the VPN results in 1 IP or a small set of IPs that make you trackable particularly when combined w/your client fingerprint.

Your advice is still dangerous. It's also pointless & unethical. Suggesting less effective tools to feed is foolish

@Gargron

@theprivacyfoundation
That's dangerous advice. Have a look at CVE-2019-14899. All VPNs compromised.

No one claims you can have "perfectionism". Of course, there are good options and bad options. sites like mastodon.social are profoundly stupid choices to endorse.

Even if you neglect the hostility & weakness, CF still sees all traffic. Also, using CF feeds a abuser financially, which works against your alleged cause.

@Gargron

@theprivacyfoundation
Sure there are many instances. Some are respecting of & , and some are not. is an abuser of privacy & . You've specifically endorsed a CF node (mastodon.social). As a "privacy foundation", you should know better and you should set a better example.

@Gargron

resist1984 boosted

@bojkotiMalbona
If the house across the street installs or in a way that surveils my house, it will be an act of war.

@bojkotiMalbona
If the house across the street installs or in a way that surveils my house, it will be an act of war.

resist1984 boosted

Have any U.S. cities legislated against a neighbor installing #Amazon #Ring such that it surveils the neighbor across the street?

Show more
Mastodon 🔐 privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!