@ansuz @cryptpad Sure it's their decision to subject users to the abuse of CloudFlare. It's also the decision of privacy-respecting users to boycott CloudFlare and go elsewhere. If one can take the software without stepping into CloudFlare's walled-garden, that may be a decent option, as long as they don't need to enter CloudFlare's walled-garden for documentation or support.
@thoughtcrime @nextcloud CloudFlare has centralized around ~10-15% of the web. It's quite far from 100%, but it is much too much already for one privacy abuser to control.
@ansuz @cryptpad Signal has a huge list of privacy abuses documented here: https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/779. Loomio's services are jailed in the privacy-abusing walled-garden of CloudFlare, the ethical problems of which are documented here: https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/374
@cryptpad Useful overall but ethical.net lists some unethical choices: DDG, Loomio, Signal. Looks like they may be following the crowd and not doing research.
@nextcloud that is not a good site to pimp to privacy enthusiasts. It's a CloudFlare site.