The right to be online should be coupled with a right to be offline.
@resist1984 And more generally, freedom should mean having options.
@resist1984 a bit of a tangent, but: same with "smart/IoT" devices.
I said it before -- as long as the core functionality is not related to networked computing (say, toaster, fridge, washing machine, TV screen) I should be able to buy a device with the same parameters as a "smart/IoT" device but with the "smart/IoT" capabilities *provably* disabled or (ideally) not existent.
@resist1984 or regulation requiring provably disabled smart/IoT functionality in such cases.
@resist1984 Similarly with free software, I heard some people say that the freedom to use (freedom 0) should be amended with a freedom to refuse.