For everyone who’s had enough of online tracking, DuckDuckGo lets you take back your online privacy now.

duckduckgo.com/about?ko=-1&atb

@davidoclubb
Great, thanks David. I am learning to do things right then! I shared it on Facebook too πŸ˜‡

@davidoclubb @resist1984 @gomez @anniemo71 searx is just a pile of damn kid scripts. it does not search a shit. it's just a wrap over the same Google or DDG, stealing the results of their work and possibly tracing users search requests on the net. who said that domain isn't spying on you? this is just a cheap kind of surveillance, without doing any work, without real network spiders and data storage.
Follow

@iron_bug @anniemo71 @gomez @davidoclubb Ss is not searx; it's custom. But wrt searx, no kid in moms basement is financially equipped to exploit data to the extent of . We're talking very costly AI.

Β· Β· 2 Β· 0 Β· 0

@davidoclubb @gomez @anniemo71 @iron_bug Facebook is even figuring out which of their users are gay with very high accuracy. You don't have to worry about searx (FOSS s/w) doing that.

@iron_bug @anniemo71 @gomez @davidoclubb i sense some sympathy for tech giants (as you equated scraping Google/MS results with "stealing"). IMO scraping their results is the best scenario, because it uses the resources of tech giants without compensating them, which means not only not feeding privacy abusers, but costing them. That's a good thing.

@davidoclubb @resist1984 @gomez @anniemo71 why not? people built really large search system and it works fine. well, it did generally work fine, until they began to shove AI in it and it messed it up a way. but it still works somehow. DDG can work without scripts, which is very valuable in modern Internet. so yes, I think stealing their results isn't just fair. I never considered theft a good thing. if you're so tough, go get your own crawler and collect your own data. for free. and we'll see what it all is worth, in real.
@davidoclubb @resist1984 @gomez @anniemo71 who said? we don't know what's undercover and what data they collect. any why should anybody trust that noname better than, say, DDG?

@iron_bug @anniemo71 @gomez @davidoclubb @iron_bug has /proven/ to violate their privacy policy: techrights.org/2021/03/15/duck An unknown is of course more worthy of trust than a known cheater. Garage operations just don't have the capital to finance a large scale AI engine.. Only very big money interests behind GAFAM have that kind of cash to invest.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon πŸ” privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!