@eletrotupi @glitterwitch Stanford studied police cam footage for over a year, and found a strong correlation between whether the cop was respectful (using words like "please", "sir", "ma'am" vs. barking out orders with words like "bro", "homey") and skin color. And if you study police attitude & language for a particular intervention, the race could be determined ~70% of the time.
@resist1984 @glitterwitch Meanwhile researchers at Arizona analized over the course of four years of footage and come to the terms that it bodycams didn't made them less agressive whatsoever.
There are various studies and different degree of results.
I think we have enough data to know that bodycameras isn't enough and it's time to move on to more radical changes.
@eletrotupi @glitterwitch can you give a link to that study? It contradicts everything we've seen. Cameras have proven to reduce violence over decades. It's in fact why prisons have cameras, according to Edward Snowden.
@eletrotupi @glitterwitch Unwarranted surveillance is generally abusive for the the reason pointed out by Snowden, but exceptionally police encounters are different b/c you already lose the freedom privacy gives when under direct police observation. In that case, the cameras protect you from police misconduct. In effect, the *cop* is less free, and rightly so.
@glitterwitch @eletrotupi consider the recent case where an Ohio cop turned off his camera before shooting dead a black man & not rendering aid. The fact that he turned it off is in itself incriminating, coupled with the bits of footage they still got. Had there been no camera at all, it would have been purely a cops word against a dead man's word. That cop would still be working instead of going to trial.