Today's act of kindness: I helped two victims of surveillance (mainstream users) with some basic privacy:
Google search > DuckDuckGo
Chrome > Firefox + uBlock Origin
Gmail > @Tutanota
Minimize number of apps
Simple actions that cuts a big chunk of surveillance. As usual they were surprised how it works.
@Tutanota @jonas @Tutanota #Duckduckgo is a terrible recommendation. see https://dev.lemmy.ml/post/29179
Privacy is almost always relative to the threat model of the individual.
Searxes often get blocked or simply don't return anything due to bad configuration.
Despite that I prefer them and recomended it to all my tech friends.
However it's simply a poor choice for an average person that preffers stuff like search bubbles and targeted ads
@wuwei @jonas Searxes is coded to randomly select from a pool of quality searx instances on each query. It then does some post-processing to filter #CloudFlare results. Searxes never says "due to #CAPTCHA there are no results". IDK how it avoids that. Either the source pool is only instances that don't scrape or it jumps to another instance in the background.
@wuwei @jonas Like #DDG, all searx instances are inherently meta-search engines. Searxes is a meta-search of searx instances, which you could call a meta-meta-search. Meta-searching does not necessarily imply scraping. A meta-search can be accomplished by scraping &/or using an API. The searx s/w is #freesoftware not designed for corporate protectionism. It's unlikely that Searxes scrapes.
@resist1984
I looked at it now. It's a meta-searx. That means it scrapes off of other searx instances and switches between them as needed.
However it also means it lacks some basic searx features like choosing which search engines to use.
Something that is very important depending on your language or when searching for images and other specific file formats.
Also it's hosted by some random dude in Germany which isn't exactly ideal.
Thanks for the link still
@jonas