resist1984 boosted

I don't know who the fuck you are, #cloudflare, but anytime your name comes up, it's never good. Whatever it is you do, you certainly do a pretty damn shitty job of it!

twitter.com/JonnyGators/status

resist1984 boosted

Afghanistan, uspol 

My take:

This wasn't a fuckup on the part of the U.S.

It was a successful, 20-year money laundering scheme.

Trillions of dollars' worth of Gen X's adulthood and Millennials' childhood were funneled out of American society, through Afghanistan

And into the pockets of defense contractors -- who are largely Republicans.

All those cushy, well-paying DC jobs in the past two decades -- these reports and videos are the price.

The Taliban aren't mystical superheroes who defeated the best armed forces on earth. They were the premise and the excuse for this multi-decade scam.

This wasn't a failure of the US military, either. Common soldiers were fooled and used.

And it's not Biden's fault -- or even Trump's really (though Trump made it worse because that's his shtick).

It's Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Rove, and earlier Republicans who made this happen.

"Never forget."

resist1984 boosted
resist1984 boosted

there is a whois service for onion sites. Not sure it's of great use, but FWIW here's a sample => torsocks whois -h torwhois.com underwood2hj3pwd.onion

resist1984 boosted

@Doemela Does anyone know the v3 onion hosts for the #OnionMail.info servers? They're still listing the v2 onions which are apparently broken. onionmail.info/directory.html

resist1984 boosted

@kubikpixel indeed. .org is a privacy abusing . And they recently got worse. Ecosia has recently become a site, which is bad for privacy and the planet.

I actually cannot buy something because the /only/ sites that sell it are Cloudflare sites or , both of which I boycott. I will therefore go without.

Dear developers: plz make the “site:” parameter capable of wildcards so I don't have to add this to every search => “-site:amazon.com -site:amazon.de -site:amazon.ca -site:amazon.fr -site:amazon.sa -site:amazon.co.uk”.. and then do the same for ebay. ATM it's like a game of whack-a-mole.

resist1984 boosted

@resist1984 neither coincidental or laziness: it's #AffiliateMarketing.

Every click stores a cookie in your browser and if you complete any purchase on Amazon within 24h after clicking that link, they gain a 10-15% commission on the sale.

That's why almost all "reviews" of such products say amazing things about it. They could care less about the product, they only want you to goddamn buy it already.

Sadly, it's not just Amazon. Lots of platforms do these affiliates nowadays...

Product review articles almost always give a link to where to buy the thing, and that link always points to , which I find disturbing. Are they getting a kickback from Amazon, or are they just being lazy? I'm guessing the latter.

resist1984 boosted

It is exciting to see #Amazon's #Drone delivery program collapsing, I hope this is the end of this idea. It would really have a horrible impact on so many aspects of daily life. wired.co.uk/article/amazon-dro

resist1984 boosted

Why does the #creditCard company receive details about the flights you book? They don't seem to receive transaction details for any other kind of transaction. The credit card statement doesn't show me what specifically I bought in a shop or restaurant. Why is there difference in the info sharing when buying air travel?

The right to be online should be coupled with a right to be offline.

Show thread

There has been a fight for the right to be online (in part to push for Internet in rural America & for the poor). Superficially that's fair, but the problem is govs already operate with the assumption that people are online. So people are being forced to use & trust svcs from dubious gov-admin'd sites (e.g. ). How can I opt out? Now we need a right to be *offline*.

is surprisingly approved by more countries than any other : web.archive.org/web/2021073016 ...which suggests you can probably enter more countries having been immunized by AstraZenica.

When archive.org gives bad results (e.g. “you've sent too many requests”) the next escalation is often to use metasearch.nl or xeek.com to search, then use their “cache” feature which visits the site through . But those two search engines often come back with “Warning! This instance does not support direct URL opening.” Is there a more robust proxy?

The only thing I don't like about this angle of attack is that I generally & , so it then becomes a question of which corp is more evil, ups/fedex or the corp who must pay ~$6 for every letter you send?

Show thread

I don't know if the fax machines/servers of CT Corporation are so-called “secure fax”, but it wouldn't it be funny if they were receiving faxes like many people, that is by a 3rd party service that just delivers the fax by email anyway?

Show thread

So if you fax a letter to a corp whose resident agent is CT Corporation to the fax# of CT Corporation, they will print the fax & send it by UPS at their client's expense. So have fun sending letters to corporations that say "sorry I cannot/will not email outlook/google for $whatever_reason.. so I'm faxing your reg. agent" They will pay around $6 for each letter sent that way

Show thread
Show more
Mastodon 🔐 privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!