kravietz 🦇 @kravietz@social.privacytools.io

@ScottMortimer

Yup nothing new there. In fact 5G and other modern antenna are lower in power unlike in the past when the frequencies we used (same ones by the way) had MUCH more power pumped into them.

So in fact thats just cognitive bias. you see more devices and assume that means more exposure. But in fact its the opposite, more devices means lower power per atenna (and device) and thus overall lower exposure, not higher.

Luckily the extremely high historic exposure did give us one benefit. More than enough data to know its safe, even at higher power levels.

@nikolal

@nikolal

I understand the paranoia, I really do. But the science in this case is not hard to follow and should help address the paranoia.

I'm not suggesting you rely on anyone else, just try to understand the science as to why these frequencies dont cause cancer. The individual photons just dont have the energy to ionize electrons off of single atoms. The research confirms this, but even basic understanding of physics should make it evident why that is the case.

@ScottMortimer

@nikolal

Why would time need to tell? The frequency and power used in 5G has been in use for a long time already. You've already been bathing in 5G frequencies 25Ghz) for a long time along with the rest of society.

No need for time to tell, time already has told. 5G is a new protocol, but the frequency itself is not.

@ScottMortimer

@nikolal

Sure.

So first off no legitimate sources say "it is harmful under 150 meters".

In fact every study we have that has passed scrutnity has told us that the frequency and power involved in 5G is harmless even if you happen to be standing right in front of the tower.

There is an exception to this. I know of one study where they pumped twns of thousands times the power you would be exposed to by standing right in font of a tower into a cage of rats over extended periods of exposure. In this particular study a very small percentage of male rate showed some cancer while none of th female rates did. The numbers were so small however, even in this exagerated case, and the sample size was so small, it is hard to tell if the cancer we saw was just random or actually the result of the EM, because even at such insanely high levels it appeared that if there was an effect on cancer, that effect was very small.

So is it measurable, yes it is, but the thing is, 5G frequencies at any power level (withink reason) are well within safety margins because these frequencies simply dont cause cancer, it isnt a power issue (for the most part)

When it comes to cancer and radiation it all come sdown to frequency. Pump up the frequency high enough and even at low power it will easily cause cancer. But around the 25 ghz range you cant get cancer even if you tried, you can sleep on top of a transmitting cell antenna (they are actually very low power) and you'll be fine.

@ScottMortimer