kravietz 🦇 @kravietz@social.privacytools.io

@Cheeseness

When someone comes to my door asking for money to save rainforests it's usually Greenpeace and then I'd ask them why are they lobbying for increased use of biomass which the direct reasons why the forests are being cut down in the first place.

@Wetrix Well after 90 years I don't think it would be fair to free her

Front page of Brazil's Folha
de São Paulo newspaper this morning: "In Brazil, one dead per minute."

Dear Mastodon, please welcome 👋 @dcid a hero of Internet security, original author of OSSEC project who just decided to join the decentralized web 👍

@farhan

Search for IPv6 here https://dev-sec.io/baselines/linux/ this covers mostly ND and ICMPv6 related controls in Linux but easy to generalize

Is rp_filter enabled (kernel)

Are IPv6 bogons blocked on input and output (firewall)

https://team-cymru.com/community-services/bogon-reference/

Access controls - IPv6 needs proper firewalls configured as you can no longer rely on half-baked solutions like NAT for access controls.

Privacy extensions on clients

Specific ICMPv6 types to be allowed

If they use BGP, do they follow MANRS

If you want to understand the essence of the Precautionary Principle, read the last one 😂

4 June 1989 Poland peacefully voted commies out of the government.

@Wetrix I've just learned there's an aligator in Poland living in a zoo and she just had her 90-th birthday!

@feld

Precisely, if you apply force in the name of law and public order, there's much larger responsibility on you, not less.

@feld

Yes, no procedures can preempt all real-life scenarios completely.

And yes, the procedures regulating use of force by police certainly did result in totally unfair blaming or even convictions of cops who properly applied restraint on aggressive and rich people on speed or cocaine or alcohol, but their lawyers were able to turn that from heels to head.

But no, in these particular cases that triggered the current protests this was systematic and evident abuse of force.

@feld

It's a classic binary choice fallacy.

The guy does not understand - or more likely intentionally obscures - the concept of "excessive use of force".

The scenario he tries to build is "a man high on drugs" so someone totally uncontrollable (on PCP or Ketamine) and a bullshit scenario where a cop is afraid of restraining the perpetrator in fear of using force.