> The right to defend ones-self, with violence if necessary, is enshrined in international law
Very true, Israel uses this argument during every military operation against Gaza.
Still not answering the question.
Yes, and then 1967 came and what happened exactly?
16 Ways the World Is Getting Remarkably Better: Visuals by Statistician Hans Rosling
http://www.openculture.com/?p=1077043 https://t.co/UF7IemBd3D
"Can we please stop doing ridiculous nonsense with websites that don't need it? You don't need JS to make a button press or JS to make a link work or JS to type text or JS to load all content on a page or... just no.
Developers, stop breaking the web, please."
https://nitter.net/geekygirlsarah/status/1260409688413306882#m
Related: https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/technology/using-progressive-enhancement
So apparently something did happen in 1967? What was that exactly and why are you evading even mentioning it so much?
You're evading now. There's quite a gap between 1948 and 1967. Didn't any significant happen in like 1967?
Was there any particular thing, like a major event, that could have possibly triggered West Bank occupation? 🤔
> which political system are you referring to
This the founding principle of Hamas. And I'm sure you are aware of recent case when a Palestinian "journalist" Hind Khoudary denounced another Palestinian journalist Rami Aman to Hamas for being on a Skype call with a journalist from Israel. Then he was arrested and never seen since. This is how she justified it:
U2F offers the "high security" functionality you use "pass" for. Initially I was like "OMG I'm now going to switch all my authentication to U2F" but after a year I'm gradually moving to only use it for high-security websites. Simply because having to stick a physical device into computer is quite an usability obstacle to do it on every silly shopping session.
I'm all for looking beyond tribalism but do you realize that half of the plan depends on a political party for which any normalisation of relations with Jews is "the worst sin"?
P.S. the author is a convicted paedophile but let's assume this doesn't influence his proposal
Your meme somehow missed this nuanced views of "a democratic secular state".
Yeah, 9m people are just going to disappear. I think I've heard that before. Wow, very socialist, such decency.
There's actually a lot of discussion I've seen especially in US media suggesting that herd immunity is the only way forward and we will eventually all need to do what Sweden did. This discussion certainly has to take place and this "massive amounts of death and suffering" doesn't help in keeping this discussion fact based.
> You base your verdict about the Swedish measurements on 3000 Covid-related deaths
On 3000 *extra* deaths as compared to other countries - Sweden has 3500, the closest down (Denmark) has 500. If we compensate for population (2x) it's still 2500 vs 1000.
> Nonetheless, I really liked our conversation
Absolutely yes, same here! It's a really rare thing to discuss on this level on social media although Mastodon is much better in this aspect than the mainstream ones.
@guenther Didn't know that! That's 100% the same mentality 🤦♂️
Polish expat into UK. Information security engineer. Caver & cave rescuer (thus the bat). NHS volunteer & blood donor.