Of course, coal has massive *external* costs, namely pollution, waste, CO2, that are not captured in the spot price.
Meanwhile France π«π· has the same 130 EUR/MWh price as Germany π©πͺ but 7x (seven times) lower emissions - it burns no coal and barely any gas. It's nuclear fleet is on the other hand running at 70% capacity right now:
100% agreed about the lack of fact-based approach to energy generation technologies.
As for hydro, it's clearly one of the cleanest in terms of CO2 and other operational emissions, as seen in Norway for example.
Primary disadvantage is geography - small, flat or densely populated countries are a no-go for hydro unfortunately.
I've been considering air-to-air heat pump (basically, AC that can both cool and heat) for my home. Still in the process of considering due to rather significant construction and financial impact :)
Unfortunately, a bunch of snake-oil salesmen are trying to sell us the idea of environmentalism instead of providing solutions to the power needs around the world and a bunch of us are buying it because a fantasy of magic boxes that can defy the laws of thermodynamics on a macro scale will always be more attractive than the reality that you're always choosing between a bunch of bad options.