Follow

@nurinoas @openrisk

I'm mainly arguing that an approach, where someone makes an arbitrary decision how farming should be done based on pseudo-scientific and sectarian criteria is not sustainable from both environmental and socio-economic point of view.

And the most widespread definition of , where say copper sulphate is "organic" but say glyphosate is "inorganic", is indeed sectarian and pseudo-scientific.

Just to be clear, I don't mind permaculture and other sound farming practices.