β€œThe Government correctly believes that the ugliness of new development is one major reason why people oppose it” πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§

telegraph.co.uk/family/life/br

@kravietz Paywalled, but I wonder if attempts to squeeze labour costs are at fault. The house I live in was built in the 1960s - each brick laid by hand. That's very rare to see nowadays, it's prefabricated wherever possible, yet newbuilt prices are still going up and up.

Follow

@michiel

The article is full of deliberations on "pleasant hedges" and "glorious neo-traditionalism". Concepts like energy efficiency or even ergonomy apparently aren't in scope of interest of an average Telegraph reader 🀷

Β· Β· 1 Β· 0 Β· 1

@kravietz part of that is cultural in nature. I live in the Netherlands; our building style is *very* similar to that of the UK. Energy-efficiency is piss poor due to an extremely mild climate and very cheap local natural gas. 60s and 70s houses here were built with huge single-pane windows. It looked cool, and heating was nearly free.

I have the impression that in Northern and Central/Eastern Europe, there was never any doubt that a house *has* to shelter you from the cold.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon πŸ” privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!