Let's be clear, I do not condone the action, especially as a former commercial pilot myself.
It's the hypocrisy of the reactions that gets in my tits though.
So what's a non-hypocritical reaction to what happened in Minsk?
1) "doesn't matter because in 2013 another country did something remotely similar"
2) "it was bad, but what about 2013"
3) other options? 🤔
@kravietz @0
There is a huge difference.
Do you know what international law is?
Have you heard about diplomatic immunity?
Try to imagine that Belarus forces to land presidential plane of some of American puppets.
""The president has been kidnapped by imperialism, and he is being held in Europe," he said in a televised address late Tuesday night. The vice president called for workers worldwide to protest "this act of imperial arrogance."
@kravietz
have a nice day
Cool, tribal thinking for the win then!
@kravietz
Do I really have to spell it out? Not sure if you're taking the piss here.
Once you've cast your stone, there is no non-hypocritical reaction (other than “ah you've got us there lad” which obviously nobody is going to say in public). That is the whole point I'm making.
I didn't down Evo Morales plane. Can I say what Lukashenka did was wrong? 🤔
> ah you've got us there lad
Define "you" and "us". How does actions of France in 2013 justify actions of Belarus in 2021? Does it mean that nobody in France can today condemn arrest of Protasevich? Nobody in EU?
Are people in Belarus allowed to condemn this arrest? In Russia?
Where's the boundary of who can condemn it - or not - per your tribal logic?
@0 The case of Morales was at least dubious. Someone might have used a legitimate emergency landing as an opportunity, but it wasn't really comparable with what Belarus did.
This is what Morales pilots said:
The “legitimate emergency” was created by denying overflight by the countries ahead in its path, thereby leaving the aeroplane without anywhere sensible to go and unable to reach its intended refuelling stop in the canary islands. They could do that because as a State flight, it's not covered by the first freedom of the air. A diversion is always a bit less unsightly than an interception and gives some tenuous semblance of deniability that can be fed to the gullible and the ignorant.
@kravietz
Mr Anyone, as you refer to him, was not on board. Else he'd be keeping company with Mr #Assange.