@dump_stack @kravietz Yeah, I know it goes through the bureaucracy. The whole language thing actually has a pretty long tradition, again - stemming from the korenisatsiia policies. If you remember the document's name, it should be possible to trace the influences directly.

But that's only one part of it. The other is implementation. It's the difference between a plan and the engineering outcome. And that other part is impacted by what you're deploying to.

Follow

@werekat @dump_stack

I kind of lost track of what you're now talking about but I found out that the 2018 law about national languages was actually amended after widespread protests from regions to include national languages as mandatory part of the school programme

pravo.ru/news/203248/

@kravietz @dump_stack That is an excellent catch, thank you. :)

As for the conversation topic - I think we're slowly winding down after the heated discussion. :P On to general methodological questions by now.

@kravietz @dump_stack That's actually a pretty good example. Social systems are constantly caught between "the more things one makes mandatory, the heavier the system" and "what are the consequences if the developments with a non-mandated element are not under regulation". It's stupid hard to work out a social policy that doesn't backfire in some way...

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon 🔐 privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!