Follow
Your point seems to be that all of them are basically the same, some twist context, some invent stories. Well, I believe that's very much the point — it makes enormous qualitative difference whether a media outlet fabricates a story about crucifixed boy, or presents actual facts in what you believe is a biased context.
From the latter you can somehow extract the facts and separate them from opinion, the former just keeps you hostage of an emotional story that is entirely false.
