For people who don't get any of this, Americans use:
* Inches and fractions for "small" things: 7½ inches, 15¾
* Feet and inches for "large" things (like more than 2 feet): 6 feet 2 inches, 30 feet 7¼.
* Thousandths of an inch for tiny things: 38 thousandths, off by a 'thou.
* 1 foot 3 3/8 inches is valid but uncommon, people typically just say 15 and 3/8ths
* 5.91 inches is weird, converting from millimeters (not hundredths of a mm) you probably best round to 5 and 15/16ths which at least is on a tape measure
* 0.79 feet is just malarkey
In England we measure speed with furlongs per fortnight.
It's a rather bizarre mix of units here - the transportation systems interchangeably uses kilometers and miles, some shop owners by principle refuse to use kilograms and insist on "pounds" (without realising a "pound" is defined in law using grams and that there was like a dozen of "pounds"), fuel efficiency is measures in miles per gallon, but it's a different gallon from the one used in the US. In general, the whole units situation is nothing but a confusing dick contest.,,
I don't have any religious or emotional attachment to any of these unit systems. F
rom purely practical point of view I find scalars such as "30 feet 7¼ inches" impractical for calculations as you need yet another layer of conversion to decode these fractions.
I have just tested, and even wolframalpha.com is unable to decode this as a valid distance. It can convert 30' 7" but gets lost at that fractional part.
@kravietz
There’s no decoding.
Tell a carpenter to cut a board adding numbers with fractional parts of 0.1875” and 0.6875” and he’ll either put down his saw and grab a calculator or the calculation will break his train of thought. He stops thinking about what laps over what and how it fastens to the wall.
Tell a carpenter to cut a board adding lengths with fractional parts 3/16” and 11/16” and 3 + 11 is 14 so half = 7 so 7/8”. That takes a heartbeat and he never stops thinking about what he’s doing.
As far as Wolfram, I don’t know the program you’re talking about but their Mathematica was written in Lisp. Lisp has rational numbers as part of the base language, add a rounding function and you won’t see 17/125 as an answer. It’s hard to believe their new version can’t do fractions or doesn’t let you add functions.
My calculators for doing plan takeoffs and such are all from Calculated Industries which has been making fractional calculators since the ‘80s. Just set it for accuracy 1” down to 1/64” and Bob’s your uncle. Lots of other people make them.
@cjd