@kravietz "sign a smart contract" what do you mean by that? deploying and interacting with contracts can be very expensive because you're manipulating state, doing a simple send is *far* cheaper
regardless, this is being addressed
@lunch This is https://ens.domains/ where any change to ENS record requires what I understand is signature done with your ETH key. They amount of ETH sent as displayed in MetaMask is shown as $0 but the gas is tens of $$$.
Thanks, that's very useful. I'm not watching the ETH world too much, just trying stuff that I find interesting and ENS was certainly one of them. Handshake also looks interesting and I'll give it a try. To be honest however, Gnunet GNS seems just as good from the functional point of view and without the whole massive blockchain overhead.
I'm just reading about the concept of L2 and it seems like #Ethereum community finally discovered that the usual mantra "do that on blockchain" isn't always the best solution for many reasons. Basically L2 is a nice name for doing things without blockchain (you could even say: "regular computation", as in L2 channels), and then only submitting the final result for the sake of keeping audit trail.
@kravietz @1010101 Yeah L2s are actually incredible, Lightning completely changed the paradigms people used to think about scaling distributed ledgers and it's just taking a while for the the academics to work out all the kinks that unlock their potential
one of the cultural issues is that there's not enough PL people in the space to build languages to tackle the complexity involved, which is unfortunate
https://medium.com/the-ethereum-name-service/general-purpose-layer-2-static-calls-proposal-presentation-by-vitalik-buterin-at-ens-online-2d752906719e
@kravietz @lunch