In this NYT feature the P2P networks are basically pictured as a slower alternative to centralised social media outlets, zero mention of what P2P is really about:
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/26/technology/big-tech-power-bitcoin.html
This is quite disappointing, as it completely misses the point of peer-to-peer communications which actually enable everyone to exercise not only their free speech, but also the less known logical extension of free speech being the right *not* to listen (aka "right against compelled listening").