@laufi @blueplanetslittlehelper @felippo

Sorry, but equating my arguments - science-based, with clear references on material use, CO2 emissions, surface power density and waste (any!) management with totally biased "100 reasons" is simply unfair. Note that my opponents didn't actually question or disprove the data I referenced as incorrect or false - they just ignored it and came up with more biased hype.