Just had a very unpleasant encounter with two advocates who seem to believe that it's literally about advocating rather than having a highly efficient source of energy with low environmental footprint.

If you are concerned about never ignore basic physical facts about the environment and technologies you're considering. It's a dead end.

Most importantly do not ignore surface power density and lifecycle CO2 emissions.

Follow

Because if you do ignore basic physical constraints, you will eventually end up believing that "green" is a country that emits 5x more CO2 per kWh while boasting it's 40% share of RE in its energy mix, and at the same time opening new fossil gas power plants. The only way to make sense out of it for you will be to come up with conspiracy theories and blame "them", while the explanation will be simple need to have 24/7 electricity supply...

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon 🔐 privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!