A big drama in the UK as Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace discover that solar farms occupy plenty of space and cannot decide what is more evil: 7 hectares of nuclear power plant or 298 km2 of solar power plant.

davidjwatson.com/rewilding/

@kravietz that reads more like propaganda than coherent argument, as if land use were the only topic here. Very one-sided.

But not surprising as he is part of this "generation atomic" thing, that is basically a lobby group posing as a "grassroots" organisation, no? ... whilst also working in the nuclear industry.

This kind of communication gives me the feel of PR greenwashing like when oil companies try to rebrand themselves as environmental. Not the whole story.

Follow

@nicksellen

> oil companies try to rebrand themselves as environmental

And you're absolutely right that fossil fuel companies did sponsor environmental NGOs to raise anti-nuclear arguments. This is documented in case of Friends of the Earth, Sierra Club, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council. Greenpeace does not reveal their funding.

forbes.com/sites/michaelshelle

Β· Β· 0 Β· 0 Β· 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon πŸ” privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!