Twitter hides Trump 'shooting' tweet for 'glorifying violence' | Engadget - https://www.engadget.com/twitter-trump-glorifying-violence-075335643.html

@Wetrix I think they should've start doing it like a year ago, but better late than never...

@kravietz the censorship on Twitter is finally coming to a head. Twitter has always been massively left wing bias because of Jack Dorsey.

I'm just glad I'm not on it and I can safely watch from Mastodon 😅

@Wetrix

I'll answer as I've answered to @freemo - marking someone post (filled with bullshit and lies) with a rather delicate suggestion "you can check more on this subject here" is not censorship by any known definition of this word :)

@kravietz @freemo they cherry pick who they do it to. Doesn't matter if it's Trump who is a lunatic to be sure but it's still bias.

@Wetrix @freemo

To be honest, they should have annotated Trump's posts like a year ago. His posts were being reported by thousands of people, but he enjoyed immunity.

@kravietz

I agree, I am find with the annotations. I just want to make sure there are legal rules in place ensuring that should there be evidence of unfairness there are reprocussions.

@Wetrix

@freemo @Wetrix

The rules are simple: if a tweet is reported by many people as abusive/fake/inciting violence it should be annotated. Trump, so far, was one of the most hateful posters, yet he enjoyed full immunity.

@kravietz

I dont think annotations should be dictated by the masses.

@Wetrix

@freemo @Wetrix

Any Internet forum had a "report a spammer" button like forever.

@kravietz

Using the community to report offending posts is ok. but those reports should be reviewed and ultimately the decision should be limited to the moderators and not a popular vote.

@Wetrix

@freemo @Wetrix

Who said it's a popular vote on Twitter? They granted him immunity for a few years already anyway.