@dump_stack I did read the whole section on EUvsDisinfo in this paper and their criticism may be summarised in the following items:

* they focus on Russia only (=selective)
* they are funded by EU (=not independent)
* they use non-neutral language when describing the fakes they debunk (see table)

First is kind of logical because majority of the anti-EU fakes originate from there.

The article does not really present any examples of debunks that would be factually wrong however.