@x I like the sentiment, though I am inclined to disagree. Freedom of the press exists for a reason. We need to be able to report on things when there is clearly something wrong (like the Snowden leaks).

There is, like you say, a lot of junk news. When Notre Dame burnt down I was upset, but I didn't need to know to much more. Once the cause was found out the coverage should have stopped.

1/?

@x similarly when there were these boys trapped under water (where-ever and whenever that was) after they got out, I didn't need to know that they had recovered. I don't care.

Opinion pieces are very good on the other hand. I pay for reliable paper newspapers that have a plethra of opinions to read from, all of which can help you make a balanced judgement of a situation.

Equally, its good to know whats going on. Skimming headlines gives me a rough idea of whats happening even if I...

2/?

@x don't read the entire piece. Equally, knowing things (i discovered that some families were unaware of lockdown somehow as they read no news) is good.

Furthermore, I think there is a place for news. But, we need to stop reporting such basic events. I read an article that basically said 'stop telling me that bitcoins price has gone up, I don't care'.

Frankly, I think we should apply that to everything. If you tell me that there is x covid cases, it will be different tomorrow. its an odd one.

@freddyym
> its good to know [...]

Yes, but you'll hear about it—if it's big enough—from other people / places anyway.

> [...] stop reporting such basic events

This, I can get behind. Certain things don't even need reporting.

Anyway, thank you for disagreeing. It'll get boring if everyone simply agreed. :)

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon 🔐 privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!