Instance side-eye
@emsenn @greyor Iām all for language changing over time, Iāve always been believed in descriptive or generative grammar, not prescriptive. Meanings of phrases do change and are corrupted. āFake newsā once began as a phrase to literally describe misleading and incorrect news, and has morphed into meaning the exact opposite. I get it. I donāt know that Iāve seen āpublic forumā weaponized to that extent but I donāt hang out in those places so I wouldnāt know.
Instance side-eye
@emsenn @greyor Maybe Iām not familiar with Mastodon etiquette? In most other public things Iāve participated in (Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, HN, FARK, Slashdot, mailing lists, web forums, Usenet, Fidonet, BBS groups, etc.) itās not considered rude to join into public discussions regardless of if you were tagged or invited or whatever. Access to the forum was considered invitation... are Mastodon norms different?
Instance side-eye
@greyor @emsenn To be fair I think in general parlance (in my personal IRL circles, and also in 25 years of following online language/meme development), public forum is usually not seen as being offensive. But what emsenn pointed out is true - whenever the bin lid is lifted and the rats scurry away to the next hate forum, they do shout about free speech and public forums and censorship. Theyāve newspeakād the words. Iād rather not let them define things, though.
Instance side-eye
@emsenn @greyor At least in the small first world bubble I have experience with, I feel like somewhere along the line people on the internet and, even more frighteningly, people *in real life* have lost the art of actually conversing with each others about controversial things without seeing each other as enemies, rather than fellow humans. Weāve devolved into bands of hyper-aggression and hyper-sensitivity. I donāt know where itās going but I doubt itās anywhere good.
Instance side-eye
@emsenn @greyor I do think the term public forum has been severely hobbled by the Voat/toxic subreddit/chan crowd, but it did at one point have a meaning outside of āI can say whatever I want without consequenceā. To me a public forum simply means that itās public, not private, and that people are conversing - not that itās an invitation or an excuse to be a jerk or to spew hate. But I expect people may disagree with me on a public forum and (non-hatefully) let me know.
Instance side-eye
@greyor @jonah @emsenn @bgcarlisle Yeah, ditto on blocking toxic things like racism. But in all social media I try not to block what I disagree with, as itās hard enough to get out of the algorithmic bubble without reinforcing it yourself. It also lets you pick up on emerging trends; I remember as far back as 2012 seeing Stormfront start to infiltrate Reddit and thinking āoh man, this is not going to end goodā. They got a little high five from Russia and now look where we are.
Instance side-eye
@greyor @jonah @emsenn @bgcarlisle I suppose everyone has a different idea of what mastodon is. In the middle of the bell curve, itās basically a federated Twitter (in which public commentary and debate is expected) or like Facebook, in which an echo chamber is desired and usually enforced by individual users by blocking those who disagree (or through Facebookās automatic algorithmic hiding). At the extremes, some people treat it like 8chan. I block the extremes.
Instance side-eye
@jonah @greyor @emsenn @bgcarlisle And the final interaction. https://wandering.shop/@hafnia/102690668637710835 Not sure why sheās mad at the instance, if she doesnāt like me thatās okie dokie, but thatās not the instanceās fault. She can easily block me if she wants, I doubt we will miss each other much.
Instance side-eye
Instance side-eye
Instance side-eye
@jonah @greyor @emsenn @bgcarlisle Sheās just salty that people on other instances comment on her posts and ask her questions that suggest they donāt agree with her. Sheās not being harassed, she just has very specific opinions and does not like others commenting on them if they disagree. I can point you to the specific threads if needed.
@schestowitz Just FYI - your siteās cert isnāt valid so your page only loads in non-TLS clear text
@hafnia Nah, I was just curious about who you were since your responses to me all seem to be condescending and aggressive. But Iāll leave you be, you seem happy enough having an all day long conversation with yourself on this platform.
@hafnia Itās probably because the chief complaint revolving around mansplaining is that it is an aggression of sorts, but the etymology of the word āmansplainingā is clearly designed to be a (counter)aggression directed at men. If you take someoneās racial or gender or sexual identity and bundle it up into a pejorative and then use it in casual conversation, you may find that the targeted group feels a bit aggrieved.
@hafnia Huh. Must be one of those Mastodon social norms I donāt understand. The difference between public and DM is literally just a different inbox from the recipient perspective. As someone weaned on Usenet decades ago, thatās difficult to relate to. Also please try not to come down too hard on me for not understanding what you were after, you did spend a bit of time in the weeds explaining how people who donāt know you personally mustnāt comment on your life, mansplaining, etc etc. ĀÆ\_(ć)_/ĀÆ
@hafnia I guess private replies must somehow be totally different than public replies. ;) Donāt get me wrong, you can feel however you want about whatever you want, itās just that the easiest way to get rando opinions out of your inbox is to not narrate your life to randos on the internets
@hafnia *writes public post to international social media platform* *gets replies from strangers* *surprised pikachu face*
@Wetrix That and the rebroadcast Twitter wingnut political crap!
Photographer / Storm Chaser / IT
https://keybase.io/digicana
Wire: @digicana