After my talk at the European Parliament today, I asked a question at the end of the second panel (03:35:47) and a corporate lobbyist attempted to tone police me (03:44:50). This was my response (03:45:06). If Iโd been any younger heโd have heard โOK Boomerโ :)
https://web-greensefa.streamovations.be/index.php/event/stream/the-future-internet-regulation
@deshipu For me, it's not that I'm technophobic but that I don't get pulled by in as much by the tech industry's marketting or "hype". I understand technology, leading me to know how empty (or worse dangerous) most of that is and how much better computers can trivially be if everyone wasn't chasing lock-in.
Unfortunately saying that technology has to serve an actual purpose can look like technophobia.
"oh a computer could definitely be conscious for sure. a pity that would require at least a millenium of sustained, cumulative effort and we're gonna lose all progress and/or die in the next century"
"In my work with mature students, I have found that inviting them to consider collapse as inevitable, catastrophe as probable and extinction as possible, has not led to apathy or depression."
Essays: The Eternal Value of Privacy - Schneier on Security #privacy #human #rights https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2006/05/the_eternal_value_of.html
Genie: You have ONE WISH.
Me: Alright, I have one, but it's very detailed.
Genie: As long as it is only one wish, you're allowed to spend as much time as you want detailing it.
Me: Alright, here we go. *Grabs notebook and takes a deep breath* The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Genie: Wait, is that...?
Me: *Flips notebook* Chapter 1. Preamble.
I wrote a short story about love and loss and networks: Rogue Processes https://dustycloud.org/misc/rogue-processes.pdf
(CW: story is not about suicide, but it is mentioned)
"global #nuclear power has prevented an average of 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2-eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that would have resulted from fossil fuel burning" co-authori is J. Hansen, one of the top global warming scientists https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es3051197
#rust destroys you as a programmer.
So you want to know about how starships work, huh? Well you came to the right place.