@schestowitz you know, instead of accusing us from being lobied, you could also just join the conversation and ask for more clarification. Im a team member as well and i do not think we should re list it. Its just a discussion point. We show all our income and outcome on opencollective, so i don't know where you would see that we are being lobbied.
Again, Please just ask for a clarification next time instead of making random accusations.
:)
@schestowitz im not understanding your question...?
"What was told to Arel" is in the Github discussion you're avoiding.
https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/1562
What's funny is that we are all being super transparent and this decision is being done with the community, and people are making hilarious accusations they we have been lobbied/paid/you name it to relist them, when they have no been relisted and as of now, won't be because thats not how PT works.
It's worth noting your taking your privacy advice from "TechRights" an HTTP site... So that's how much they are about privacy and security.
Accusations such as yours may get you some new followers on social media, but they don't get you any respect or taken seriously by anyone who actually bothers to open up the Github discussion and see what's actually happening.
That link again, since you don't seem to have it is:
https://github.com/privacytoolsIO/privacytools.io/issues/1562
@schestowitz @danarel We know, we are the one of the firdt who broke that story and push startpage to answer the questions.
