@resist1984 think of it this way.
You could get a vaccine they rammed through tests at lightning speed in 9 months and of course claiming it's safe even though the last vaccine took TEN YEARS to develop safely. It's so safe in fact that the Zuckertit was caught in leaked documents talking to the WHO fearing what it might do to DNA. OR you could just not take it and there's a 99% chance you'll be fine even if you do get it.
π
potentially risked test volunteers. But financial and scheduling risks won't cause medical problems for the vaccination programme, AFAIK.
@resist1984 @Wetrix - 2/2
@Wetrix
All the normal vaccine test protocols seem to have been followed, and all phases completed. Are you aware of any specific risky shortcuts that were taken?
It seems that the only risks taken were financial ones, with governments throwing money to manufacture doses before tests were finished, and the regulatory decision to run the phases close together rather than widely spaced only @resist1984 - 1/2