@fm who are the people you're talking about in your profile? 😅
@Wetrix you mean the intersectionalist Malthusian scum? They barely qualify as people. Look up the terms. They're the type that like to say things like "we need to lower the population" and "people are defined by their group identity." Most people causally accept things like these as common knowledge, but they're wrong. The people I'm talking about are those that deliberately push these evil ideas.
@fm ah OK I read up on it in the wiki. Crazy hey?
@Wetrix me or them?
@Wetrix yeah they are. They'll talk calmly and politely about "lowering the population' like it doesn't mean killing billions of people, come up with crazy nonsense about how there are too many people even though that is impossible. Intersectionalists take away an individual's agency and talk about people like specimens of a group to be managed who have no individual desires and no right to them. They're fancy words for slavers. They want to manage human beings the way cattle are managed. I could go on lol but I won't.
@Wetrix because it is impossible for a population to exceed the capacity for it to be supported by available resources. If there is only enough to support 5 people, he can there be 6 or 7? There cannot. As the size of a population approaches a resource limit you'll see infant mortality rise, yet we see infant mortality lowering. If we were even close to earths capacity to support us our population would not be exploding by ~15% - that's 1 billion people - every ~13 years.
@fm well you are seeing those effects, but in the poorer countries. Starvation in the world is quite common unfortunately 😕🌍
