@ThreeBadgersInATrenchcoat do you think a peer to peer approach world be more secure than servers? Servers can always be seized, and it's a 1 point of failure setup.
When you say seized, you could mean compromised unknowingly to the owner, or shut down -- and while yes, either of those situations are possibilities, as long as you're picking trustworthy VPSs, then the concern is minimal. Also storing minimal data allows for a setup that few other hosts have, where even if let's say the server gets compromised, they would get almost no data, and the data they would get would all be encrypted.
@Wetrix While P2P is certainly nice, it has a myriad of disadvantages, not the least of which is the fact that many applications, file storage for example, just aren't viable on a peer-to-peer setup. P2P is also much harder to achieve in web clients and most of the time will require someone to download a program or app. If I end up building services then it will certainly be something to look into, but if I'm using established ones, then it might be next to impossible.
1/2