Just had a very unpleasant encounter with two advocates who seem to believe that it's literally about advocating rather than having a highly efficient source of energy with low environmental footprint.

If you are concerned about never ignore basic physical facts about the environment and technologies you're considering. It's a dead end.

Most importantly do not ignore surface power density and lifecycle CO2 emissions.

@Wetrix TBH I just can't make sense of flat earthers, it's beyond my comprehension as of 2020 πŸ˜‚

The RE case is different: on the first look RE is very intuitive and obvious, and it's *largely* true in small scale. It's only when you start to dig into the engineering details of industrial scale deployments, it comes out that RE certainly makes sense just not everywhere and not alone.

@kravietz
Two explanations for them:
1. Lack of education
2. Too much disinformation on social media

The Social Dilemma movie explains nicely second point
@Wetrix

Follow

@nikolal @kravietz QFT (quote for truth)

I have people talk to me about things and the info they're getting is from CNN or Shitbook etc

I just roll my eyes πŸ™„

Β· Β· Amaroq Β· 0 Β· 0 Β· 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon πŸ” privacytools.io

Fast, secure and up-to-date instance. PrivacyTools provides knowledge and tools to protect your privacy against global mass surveillance.

Website: privacytools.io
Matrix Chat: chat.privacytools.io
Support us on OpenCollective, many contributions are tax deductible!