Imagine where we are in terms of general education if in 2020 this picture has hundreds of likes and retweets with comments like "WOW BEES RESPECT HOLY ICON" and nobody mentions pigments in oil paint... 🤦♂️
@kravietz we’re fucked, forget the bees, they aren’t the half of it!
Yeah, 9m people are just going to disappear. I think I've heard that before. Wow, very socialist, such decency.
@kravietz again, Apartheid South Africa didn’t disappear. Don’t be so ahistorical with your ‘critique’. No ones has proposed extermination: the move to a democratic secular state is as far removed from Genocide as one could invent. That’s the point: stop inventing! Zionism is racism.
Your meme somehow missed this nuanced views of "a democratic secular state".
@kravietz it’s been view held by human rights advocates and progressives for many years now ‘A Modest Proposal’ sums it up quite succinctly. I’d be extremely surprised if you weren’t aware of it. it doesn’t propose killing or expelling anyone: no ones life is in danger. It’s the only option that is both Just and Fair. Every other alternative sanction breaches of international law on a massive. Zionists pretend otherwise but intellectual honesty requires you to look beyond tribal allegiances.
I'm all for looking beyond tribalism but do you realize that half of the plan depends on a political party for which any normalisation of relations with Jews is "the worst sin"?
P.S. the author is a convicted paedophile but let's assume this doesn't influence his proposal
@kravietz which political system are you referring to, Israel?? Jews aren’t Israelis and Israelis aren’t jews: they’re not synonyms. The US need only remove funding until Israel compiles with international law.
And criminal prosecutions in a domain entirely outside the remit of international justice are unlikely to impact someone’s lifetime spent advocating consistently for a Just and Fair resolution to conflict, the only way to lasting peace. Unless you have evidence to the contrary?
> which political system are you referring to
This the founding principle of Hamas. And I'm sure you are aware of recent case when a Palestinian "journalist" Hind Khoudary denounced another Palestinian journalist Rami Aman to Hamas for being on a Skype call with a journalist from Israel. Then he was arrested and never seen since. This is how she justified it:
@kravietz Hamas have nothing to do with the occupied West Bank nor occupied Jerusalem, as you well know. Illegally occupied, under international law, for 72 years now, long before Hamas were a thing. Again, as you well know.
Point of observation: Ignorance of Israel’s role in creating Hamas seems to be a common occurrence with Zionists, why is that? 🤔
Was there any particular thing, like a major event, that could have possibly triggered West Bank occupation? 🤔
@kravietz @kravietz yes, Israel’s 1948 Genocide of Palestine, the Nakba, where 700,000 Palestinians were forcibly displaced - documented by many Israeli and Palestinian historians. And before than the British role in promising ‘Jews a Homeland’ (not a state, let’s be quite clear and historically accurate) in the 1920s . You are aware of these events, aren’t you?
You're evading now. There's quite a gap between 1948 and 1967. Didn't any significant happen in like 1967?
@kravietz the land was occupied, illegally, in 1948 until 1967 with martial law in place, discriminatory duel legal systems for non-Jews, open air prisons - all well documented. It was still occupied after 1967. Nothing changed except the formal status of the post 67 occupation. You’re deflecting. No, you’re minimising. Why is that? Why does a civilian population under occupation from 48 to 67 not warrant your concern?
So apparently something did happen in 1967? What was that exactly and why are you evading even mentioning it so much?
@kravietz the Palestinian civilian population, already under an illegal occupation since 1948, did precisely nothing to merit their situation, legally, morally or ethically.You’re continuing to whitewash 19 years of brutal military occupation from 48 to 67. Why is that? The right to defend ones-self, with violence if necessary, is enshrined in international law for good reason: invading European colonialists don’t stop stealing land just because they’re asked. 1948-67, zionism killed thousands.
> The right to defend ones-self, with violence if necessary, is enshrined in international law
Very true, Israel uses this argument during every military operation against Gaza.
@kravietz again, Israel isn’t under existential threat from Hamas’ fireworks. Occupation confers duties and responsibilities onto the occupiers with regards to an occupied people: Israel fails to meet its legal obligations. Why?
Can you refrain from adding irrelevant images to each your comment? We're not on march or on TV, nobody sees them here.
@kravietz intellectually though that would be cowardice as you’d have avoided responding to the accusation that defenders of apartheid Israel are racists, which is precisely the accusation I’m making of you here. So cowardice it is then?
@CyberSocialist
You should be aware of the fact that propaganda only works if you can make the target audience to look at it. I'm just as free to block you as a regular spammer and indeed not to look at whatever you're posting here.